Headless CMS vs Traditional CMS: Which Should You Choose in 2025?
Headless CMS vs Traditional CMS: Which Should You Choose in 2025?
In today’s omnichannel world, businesses need flexible content systems. Enter the debate: Headless CMS vs Traditional CMS.
Traditional CMS
- Example: WordPress, Joomla
- Pros: Easy to use, all-in-one solution
- Cons: Less flexible for mobile apps or multi-platform delivery
Headless CMS
- Example: Strapi, Sanity, Contentful
- Pros: Backend-only — delivers content via API to any frontend (web, mobile, IoT)
- Cons: Requires developers, higher setup cost
When to Use What
- Use Headless: For mobile-first apps, JAMstack websites, or enterprise systems
- Use Traditional: For blogs, small business websites, brochure sites
i4 builds CMS solutions tailored to your growth stage and tech stack.